354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18411041)
21. Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials.
Bausell RB; Lee WL; Soeken KL; Li YF; Berman BM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 15196613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized clinical trials behind level A recommendations in obstetric practice bulletins: compliance with CONSORT statement.
Chauhan SP; Berghella V; Sanderson M; Siddiqui D; Hendrix NW; Magann EF
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 18979412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
Dechartres A; Charles P; Hopewell S; Ravaud P; Altman DG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 20705426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Harms M
Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
Hill CL; LaValley MP; Felson DT
Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Mar; 46(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 11920415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting.
Karri V
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(8):787-96. PubMed ID: 16876074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trends in neonatology and pediatrics publications over the past 12 years.
Tov AB; Lubetzky R; Mimouni FB; Alper A; Mandel D
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Jul; 96(7):1080-2. PubMed ID: 17524021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.
Peters MJ; Mukhtar A; Yunus RM; Khan S; Pappalardo J; Memon B; Memon MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jun; 104(6):1548-61; quiz 1547, 1562. PubMed ID: 19491872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Haidich AB; Birtsou C; Dardavessis T; Tirodimos I; Arvanitidou M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 21172601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality of surgical randomized controlled trials for acute cholecystitis: assessment based on CONSORT and additional check items.
Shikata S; Nakayama T; Yamagishi H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2008; 15(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 18535768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.
Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Brezden-Masley C; Dent R; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1993-9. PubMed ID: 15143092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
Finckh A; Tramèr MR
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
