These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18412496)

  • 1. Design and calibration of load sensing orthopaedic implants.
    Bergmann G; Graichen F; Rohlmann A; Westerhoff P; Heinlein B; Bender A; Ehrig R
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021009. PubMed ID: 18412496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total hip joint prosthesis for in vivo measurement of forces and moments.
    Damm P; Graichen F; Rohlmann A; Bender A; Bergmann G
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 19889565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy.
    Brimacombe JM; Wilson DR; Hodgson AJ; Ho KC; Anglin C
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):034503. PubMed ID: 19154074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An instrumented implant for in vivo measurement of contact forces and contact moments in the shoulder joint.
    Westerhoff P; Graichen F; Bender A; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 18789749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multiaxial force-sensing implantable tibial prosthesis.
    Kirking B; Krevolin J; Townsend C; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(9):1744-51. PubMed ID: 16023656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine.
    Wilson DC; Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Oxland TR; Wilson DR
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 16321637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a testing methodology to quantify bone load transfer patterns for multiple stemmed implants in a single bone with an application in the distal ulna.
    Austman RL; Quenneville CE; Beaton BJ; King GJ; Gordon KD; Dunning CE
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):024502. PubMed ID: 18412513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.
    Heinlein B; Kutzner I; Graichen F; Bender A; Rohlmann A; Halder AM; Beier A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 May; 24(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 19285767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An instrumented implant for vertebral body replacement that measures loads in the anterior spinal column.
    Rohlmann A; Gabel U; Graichen F; Bender A; Bergmann G
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 16931099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a 4-axis load cell used for lumbar interbody load measurements.
    Demetropoulos CK; Morgan CR; Sengupta DK; Herkowitz HN
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):846-51. PubMed ID: 19447666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of prosthesis design and impression techniques on human cortical bone strain around oral implants under load.
    Akça K; Kokat AM; Sahin S; Iplikcioglu H; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 19269878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implantable 9-channel telemetry system for in vivo load measurements with orthopedic implants.
    Graichen F; Arnold R; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Feb; 54(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 17278582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Rao M; Bergmann G
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19268291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.