212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18412500)
1. Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography.
Atay SM; Kroenke CD; Sabet A; Bayly PV
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021013. PubMed ID: 18412500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ex vivo bovine liver nonlinear viscoelastic properties: MR elastography and rheological measurements.
Jugé L; Foley P; Hatt A; Yeung J; Bilston LE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Feb; 138():105638. PubMed ID: 36623403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-dependent viscoelastic parameters of mouse brain tissue estimated by MR elastography.
Clayton EH; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2391-406. PubMed ID: 21427486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dispersion in Tissue-Mimicking Gels Measured with Shear Wave Elastography and Torsional Vibration Rheometry.
Yengul SS; Barbone PE; Madore B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):586-604. PubMed ID: 30473175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear wave velocity imaging using transient electrode perturbation: phantom and ex vivo validation.
DeWall RJ; Varghese T; Madsen EL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):666-78. PubMed ID: 21075719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source.
Brinker ST; Kearney SP; Royston TJ; Klatt D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of viscoelastic property characterization of plastisol phantoms with magnetic resonance elastography and high-frequency rheometry.
Lefebvre PM; Koon KT; Brusseau E; Nicolle S; Palieme JF; Lambert SA; Grenier D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1216-1219. PubMed ID: 28268544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of five viscoelastic models for estimating viscoelastic parameters using ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Zhou B; Zhang X
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():109-116. PubMed ID: 29879581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of Vibration Waveform on MR Elastography].
Tanaka M; Numano T; Habe T; Ito D; Maeno T; Ueki T; Igarashi K; Mizuhara K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 30890671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of anisotropic mechanical properties in porcine brain white matter ex vivo using magnetic resonance elastography.
Schmidt JL; Tweten DJ; Badachhape AA; Reiter AJ; Okamoto RJ; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():30-37. PubMed ID: 29253729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties of viscoelastic media by local frequency estimation of divergence-free wave fields.
Clayton EH; Okamoto RJ; Bayly PV
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Feb; 135(2):021025. PubMed ID: 23445070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractal network dimension and viscoelastic powerlaw behavior: II. An experimental study of structure-mimicking phantoms by magnetic resonance elastography.
Guo J; Posnansky O; Hirsch S; Scheel M; Taupitz M; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):4041-53. PubMed ID: 22674199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast tomoelastography of the mouse brain by multifrequency single-shot MR elastography.
Bertalan G; Guo J; Tzschätzsch H; Klein C; Barnhill E; Sack I; Braun J
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Apr; 81(4):2676-2687. PubMed ID: 30393887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Creep-Recovery (ARFICR): A Noninvasive Method to Characterize Tissue Viscoelasticity.
Amador Carrascal C; Chen S; Urban MW; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Jan; 65(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 29283342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tabletop magnetic resonance elastography for the measurement of viscoelastic parameters of small tissue samples.
Ipek-Ugay S; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Guo J; Hirsch S; Sack I; Braun J
J Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 251():13-8. PubMed ID: 25554945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An automatic differentiation-based gradient method for inversion of the shear wave equation in magnetic resonance elastography: specific application in fibrous soft tissues.
Chatelin S; Charpentier I; Corbin N; Meylheuc L; Vappou J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(13):5000-19. PubMed ID: 27300107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
