These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18412559)

  • 21. Can automated dermoscopy image analysis instruments provide added benefit for the dermatologist? A study comparing the results of three systems.
    Perrinaud A; Gaide O; French LE; Saurat JH; Marghoob AA; Braun RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 157(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 17854361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The challenge of objective scar colour assessment in a clinical setting: using digital photography.
    Anderson JC; Hallam MJ; Nduka C; Osorio D
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):379-87. PubMed ID: 26562381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Border detection in dermoscopy images using hybrid thresholding on optimized color channels.
    Garnavi R; Aldeen M; Celebi ME; Varigos G; Finch S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Mar; 35(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 20832992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Polarization color imaging system for on-line quantitative evaluation of facial skin lesions.
    Kang H; Jung B; Nelson JS
    Dermatol Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1350-6. PubMed ID: 17958588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
    dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A quantitative assessment of the human skin surface using polarized light digital photography and its dermatologic significance.
    Bae EJ; Seo SH; Kye YC; Ahn HH
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20636994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis.
    Blum A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Steins A; Roehm S; Garbe C; Soyer HP
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 Nov; 18(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 15482291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo near-infrared autofluorescence imaging of pigmented skin lesions: methods, technical improvements and preliminary clinical results.
    Wang S; Zhao J; Lui H; He Q; Zeng H
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 22724585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of digital dermoscopy in a pigmented lesion clinic: clinician versus computer assessment of malignancy risk.
    Boldrick JC; Layton CJ; Nguyen J; Swetter SM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 17109995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Dermatoscopy: an asset in the clinical assessment of pigmented skin lesions].
    Bergman W
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1574-8. PubMed ID: 12224479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and validation of a new Skin Color Chart.
    de Rigal J; Abella ML; Giron F; Caisey L; Lefebvre MA
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17250540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new device for assessing changes in skin viscoelasticity using indentation and optical measurement.
    Clancy NT; Nilsson GE; Anderson CD; Leahy MJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 May; 16(2):210-28. PubMed ID: 20456102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated color calibration method for dermoscopy images.
    Iyatomi H; Celebi ME; Schaefer G; Tanaka M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Mar; 35(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 20933366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated prescreening of pigmented skin lesions using standard cameras.
    Cavalcanti PG; Scharcanski J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Sep; 35(6):481-91. PubMed ID: 21489751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spectrophotometric imaging of cutaneous pigmented lesions: discriminant analysis, optical properties and histological characteristics.
    Tomatis S; Bartoli C; Bono A; Cascinelli N; Clemente C; Marchesini R
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 1998 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9491594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using 3D differential forms to characterize a pigmented lesion in vivo.
    Zhou Y; Smith M; Smith L; Warr R
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 20384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discrimination between cutaneous pigmentation and erythema: comparison of the skin colorimeters Dermacatch and Mexameter.
    Baquié M; Kasraee B
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 24033842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-assisted analysis of epiluminescence microscopy images of pigmented skin lesions.
    Debeir O; Decaestecker C; Pasteels JL; Salmon I; Kiss R; Van Ham P
    Cytometry; 1999 Dec; 37(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 10547610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement of skin stretch using digital image speckle correlation.
    Staloff IA; Rafailovitch M
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 19159375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Algorithmic reproduction of asymmetry and border cut-off parameters according to the ABCD rule for dermoscopy.
    Pellacani G; Grana C; Seidenari S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2006 Nov; 20(10):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17062034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.