These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413018)

  • 1. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy. Introductory comments.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Apr; 34(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 18413018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy. Part 1. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: time order, specification of the study base and specificity.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Apr; 34(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18413019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jul; 34(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18577320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy. Part 3: principles of causality in epidemiological research: statistical stability, dose- and duration-response effects, internal and external consistency, analogy and biological plausibility.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Oct; 34(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 18854072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confounding in health research.
    Greenland S; Morgenstern H
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of causation for interpreting occupational epidemiology research: a case study of quartz and cancer.
    Goldsmith DF
    Occup Med; 1996; 11(3):433-49. PubMed ID: 8887378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of low to moderate relative risks in environmental epidemiologic studies.
    Acquavella JF; Friedlander BR; Ireland BK
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():179-201. PubMed ID: 8054080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
    Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How statistics can be used to promote better health care.
    Sinclair J
    Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 23-29; 95(25):44-6. PubMed ID: 10497591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The association of body mass index with health outcomes: causal, inconsistent, or confounded?
    Shahar E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 170(8):957-8. PubMed ID: 19755631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vandenbroucke and Pearce respond to "incident and prevalent exposures and causal inference".
    Vandenbroucke J; Pearce N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):846-7. PubMed ID: 26507304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Practical Guide to Selection Bias in Instrumental Variable Analyses.
    Swanson SA
    Epidemiology; 2019 May; 30(3):345-349. PubMed ID: 30896458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Bias and confounding in the epidemiologic studies].
    Ren T; Zhan ST; Shen X; Meng FY; Hu YH; Li LM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 25(9):811-3. PubMed ID: 15555368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk relativism and physical law.
    Broadbent A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Jan; 69(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 25124189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causation of bias: the episcope.
    Maclure M; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2001 Jan; 12(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 11138805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [FROM STATISTICAL ASSOCIATIONS TO SCIENTIFIC CAUSALITY].
    Golan D; Linn S
    Harefuah; 2015 Jun; 154(6):389-93, 403. PubMed ID: 26281085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiology faces its limits.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):164-9. PubMed ID: 7618077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A typology of four notions of confounding in epidemiology.
    Suzuki E; Mitsuhashi T; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
    J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 28142011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.