260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413352)
1. Neuronal currents and EEG-MEG fields.
Dassios G
Math Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 25(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18413352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The unique determination of the primary current by MEG and EEG.
Peng L; Cheng J; Jin L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5565-80. PubMed ID: 17047270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
Im CH; Lee SY
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coupled oscillators for modeling and analysis of EEG/MEG oscillations.
Leistritz L; Putsche P; Schwab K; Hesse W; Süsse T; Haueisen J; Witte H
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 17313340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Localization of individual area neuronal activity.
Hironaga N; Ioannides AA
Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(4):1519-34. PubMed ID: 17187995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements.
Malmivuo J; Suihko V; Eskola H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Mar; 44(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 9216133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetoencephalography, a new function diagnostic method].
Vieth J
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Jun; 15(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 6088213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Functional imaging of the brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG)].
Huk WJ; Vieth J
Radiologe; 1993 Nov; 33(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 8278590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introducing priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
Garnero L; Baillet S; Marin G; Renault B; Guérin C; Meunier G
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1999; 50():183-9. PubMed ID: 10689461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional localization of brain sources using EEG and/or MEG data: volume conductor and source models.
Lopes da Silva F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1533-8. PubMed ID: 15707802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
Schimpf PH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
