These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413356)
1. Rethinking progenitive conflict: why reproductive autonomy matters. Priaulx N Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):169-200. PubMed ID: 18413356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rich discussion about reproductive autonomy. McLeod C Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 19076936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get? Stephens KU South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent". Pachman TS Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulating a revolution: the extent of reproductive rights in Canada. Washenfelder C Health Law Rev; 2003; 12(2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15742499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology. Parks J Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Degendering reproduction? Jackson E Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The constitutional implications of human cloning. Foley EP Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach. Sedillo Lopez A Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting embryos and burdening women: assisted reproduction in Italy. Robertson JA Hum Reprod; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 15229207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology in Spain: considering women's interests. De Melo-MartÃn I Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 19460223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on Canadian proposals. Morgan D Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; (81):13-5. PubMed ID: 15997537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition. Ziegler M Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(2):515-67. PubMed ID: 30707003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture? Callahan J Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy. Donchin A Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 19076940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]