These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413547)

  • 1. Dark adaptation is critical for accurate pupil measurement.
    Brown SM; Bradley JC; Khanani AM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 126(4):584. PubMed ID: 18413547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Schmidt GW; Yoon M; McGwin G; Lee PP; McLeod SD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 125(8):1037-42. PubMed ID: 17698749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the spatial shift of the pupil center.
    De Ortueta D; Schreyger F
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):906-7. PubMed ID: 16814035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective assessment of mesopic visual function after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2004 Jun; 17(2):211-24, vii. PubMed ID: 15207563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting iris registration during LASIK.
    Moshirfar M; Kurz CJ; Oberg TJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):405; author reply 405-6. PubMed ID: 19251119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Q-factor customized ablations.
    de Ortueta D; Arba Mosquera S; Magnago T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1981-2; author reply 1982-3. PubMed ID: 17137953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Q-factor customized ablations.
    Kezirian GM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1979-80; author reply 1980-1. PubMed ID: 17137950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of corneal vertex versus central pupil references with aberration-free ablation strategies and LASIK.
    Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba-Mosquera S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5287-94. PubMed ID: 18658090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Neeracher B; Senn P; Schipper I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1696-701. PubMed ID: 15313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia.
    Helgesen A; Hjortdal J; Ehlers N
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 15291941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tuan KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 16698475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal evolution of ocular aberrations following laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Benito A; Redondo M; Artal P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jul; 31(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21615763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does dilated wavefront aberration measurement provide better postoperative outcome after custom LASIK?
    Subbaram MV; MacRae SM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1813-7. PubMed ID: 16889832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zone.
    Seo KY; Lee JB; Kang JJ; Lee ES; Kim EK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):653-7. PubMed ID: 15050263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival analysis of re-treatment after laser refractive corneal surgery in patients with myopia.
    Hyon JY; Shin YJ; Choi J; Kim DH; Chuck RS
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Aug; 30(8):510-1. PubMed ID: 25075805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The influence of pupil center shift on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Wang Z; Yang B; Huang XH; Huang GF; Qiu P; Chen JQ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 41(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15774109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the mesopic pupil on patient-reported outcomes in young patients with myopia 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK.
    Schallhorn S; Brown M; Venter J; Hettinger K; Hannan S
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 30(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 24763720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.