378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413551)
21. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Willingness to Pay for CT Colonography: A Survey of Patient Preferences.
Kaye AH; Zafar HM; Jha S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):355-8. PubMed ID: 26797363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed tomographic colonography: prevalence, nature, and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program.
Chin M; Mendelson R; Edwards J; Foster N; Forbes G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Dec; 100(12):2771-6. PubMed ID: 16393234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.
Pooler BD; Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 26491809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.
Vijan S; Hwang I; Inadomi J; Wong RK; Choi JR; Napierkowski J; Koff JM; Pickhardt PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 17156139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computed tomographic colonography: colonic and extracolonic findings in an Auckland population.
Moore H; Dodd N
N Z Med J; 2012 Jun; 125(1356):68-74. PubMed ID: 22729061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC): Possibilities and limitations of clinical application in colorectal polyps and cancer.
Heuschmid M; Luz O; Schaefer JF; Kopp AF; Claussen CD; Seemann MD
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Apr; 3(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 15059026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.
Zafar HM; Yang J; Armstrong K; Groeneveld P
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 25890873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening: risks and benefits.
Pox CP; Schmiegel W
Gut; 2010 May; 59(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 20427403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extracolonic findings from CTC: balancing risks and benefits.
Rutter CM; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W470; author reply 471. PubMed ID: 19843731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography.
Sosna J; Kruskal JB; Bar-Ziv J; Copel L; Sella T
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(6):709-13. PubMed ID: 16096866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.
Sali L; Regge D
Br J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 89(1068):20160517. PubMed ID: 27542076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Projected impact of colorectal cancer screening with computerized tomographic colonography on current radiological capacity in Europe.
Hassan C; Laghi A; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Morini S
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Feb; 27(4):366-74. PubMed ID: 18005247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Greuter MJ; Berkhof J; Fijneman RJ; Demirel E; Lew JB; Meijer GA; Stoker J; Coupé VM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150910. PubMed ID: 27194458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.
Palimaka S; Blackhouse G; Goeree R
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(15):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
Hanly P; Skally M; Fenlon H; Sharp L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 23006522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
