352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18413886)
1. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Takeuchi M; Sasaguri K; Leng S; Froemming A; Kawashima A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1142-51. PubMed ID: 27015866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or =-10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds.
Simpson E; Patel U
Clin Radiol; 2006 May; 61(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 16679114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging.
Davenport MS; Neville AM; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Chaudhry HS; Leder RA
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 21555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images.
Yan L; Liu Z; Wang G; Huang Y; Liu Y; Yu Y; Liang C
Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 26031228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
Jonisch AI; Rubinowitz AN; Mutalik PG; Israel GM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 17456870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features.
Lu Q; Li CX; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 25139641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses.
Lee-Felker SA; Felker ER; Tan N; Margolis DJ; Young JR; Sayre J; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W516-24. PubMed ID: 25341166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT.
Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma.
Ding Y; Zeng M; Rao S; Chen C; Fu C; Zhou J
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(6):853-863. PubMed ID: 27833401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
