BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18414020)

  • 1. Why cells respond differently to DNA damage: a chromatin perspective.
    Fernandez-Capetillo O; Murga M
    Cell Cycle; 2008 Apr; 7(8):980-3. PubMed ID: 18414020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NuRD alert! NuRD regulates the DNA damage response.
    Smeenk G; van Attikum H
    Epigenomics; 2011 Apr; 3(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 22122276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chromatin remodeling in DNA double-strand break repair.
    Bao Y; Shen X
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2007 Apr; 17(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 17320375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activation of DNA damage response signaling by condensed chromatin.
    Burgess RC; Burman B; Kruhlak MJ; Misteli T
    Cell Rep; 2014 Dec; 9(5):1703-1717. PubMed ID: 25464843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life or Death after a Break: What Determines the Choice?
    Krenning L; van den Berg J; Medema RH
    Mol Cell; 2019 Oct; 76(2):346-358. PubMed ID: 31561953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversations between chromatin modifications and DNA double strand break repair: a commentary.
    Hendzel MJ; Greenberg RA
    Mutat Res; 2013 Oct; 750(1-2):1-4. PubMed ID: 23994712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Chromatin mobility upon DNA damage: a multi-scale story].
    Miné-Hattab J; Darzacq X
    Med Sci (Paris); 2018 Oct; 34(10):778-781. PubMed ID: 30451666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation links the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5/SNF2H to RNF168-dependent DNA damage signaling.
    Smeenk G; Wiegant WW; Marteijn JA; Luijsterburg MS; Sroczynski N; Costelloe T; Romeijn RJ; Pastink A; Mailand N; Vermeulen W; van Attikum H
    J Cell Sci; 2013 Feb; 126(Pt 4):889-903. PubMed ID: 23264744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double-strand breaks in ribosomal RNA genes activate a distinct signaling and chromatin response to facilitate nucleolar restructuring and repair.
    Korsholm LM; Gál Z; Lin L; Quevedo O; Ahmad DA; Dulina E; Luo Y; Bartek J; Larsen DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Sep; 47(15):8019-8035. PubMed ID: 31184714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.
    Ciccia A; Elledge SJ
    Mol Cell; 2010 Oct; 40(2):179-204. PubMed ID: 20965415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chromatin response to DNA double-strand break damage.
    Bao Y
    Epigenomics; 2011 Jun; 3(3):307-21. PubMed ID: 22122340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. gammaH2AX signalling during sperm chromatin remodelling in the mouse zygote.
    Derijck AA; van der Heijden GW; Giele M; Philippens ME; van Bavel CC; de Boer P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Aug; 5(8):959-71. PubMed ID: 16837249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity.
    Deem AK; Li X; Tyler JK
    Chromosoma; 2012 Apr; 121(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 22249206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ISWI chromatin remodeling complexes in the DNA damage response.
    Aydin ÖZ; Vermeulen W; Lans H
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(19):3016-25. PubMed ID: 25486562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The DNA damage response during mitosis.
    Heijink AM; Krajewska M; van Vugt MA
    Mutat Res; 2013 Oct; 750(1-2):45-55. PubMed ID: 23880065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes.
    Bakkenist CJ; Kastan MB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Dec; 36():8-12. PubMed ID: 26391293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamics of DNA damage repair and transcription.
    Shanbhag NM; Greenberg RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1042():227-35. PubMed ID: 23980011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromatin modulation and the DNA damage response.
    Costelloe T; Fitzgerald J; Murphy NJ; Flaus A; Lowndes NF
    Exp Cell Res; 2006 Aug; 312(14):2677-86. PubMed ID: 16893724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and coherence of chromatin motions.
    Locatelli M; Lawrimore J; Lin H; Sanaullah S; Seitz C; Segall D; Kefer P; Salvador Moreno N; Lietz B; Anderson R; Holmes J; Yuan C; Holzwarth G; Bloom KS; Liu J; Bonin K; Vidi PA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(29):e2205166119. PubMed ID: 35858349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chromatin modifications associated with DNA double-strand breaks repair as potential targets for neurological diseases.
    Brochier C; Langley B
    Neurotherapeutics; 2013 Oct; 10(4):817-30. PubMed ID: 24072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.