250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18414083)
1. The impact factor follies.
Rothenberg R
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):372. PubMed ID: 18414083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rise and fall of the Thomson impact factor.
Wilcox AJ
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):373-4. PubMed ID: 18414084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Epidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors.
Hernán MA
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):366-8. PubMed ID: 18414080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How come scientists uncritically adopt and embody Thomson's bibliographic impact factor?
Porta M; Alvarez-Dardet C
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):370-1. PubMed ID: 18414082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact factor: good reasons for concern.
Szklo M
Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):369. PubMed ID: 18414081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Impact factor' and 'immediacy index' of The National Medical Journal of India.
Menezes RG; Mohankumar TS
Natl Med J India; 2006; 19(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 17203690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the "impact" of academic psychiatry.
Coverdale JH; Weiss Roberts L; Balon R; Louie AK; Beresin EV
Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 18467469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary: the 'bibliographic impact factor' and the still uncharted sociology of epidemiology.
Porta M; Fernandez E; Bolúmar F
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 35(5):1130-5. PubMed ID: 16987846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Overuse of impact factors suppresses controversial ideas.
Gillis JM
Nat Neurosci; 1999 Feb; 2(2):101. PubMed ID: 10195188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The misused impact factor.
Simons K
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The impact factor of medical journals: the judgment of Solomon or the dance of the 7 veils?].
Pocard M
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(7):595-7. PubMed ID: 9805794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bibliometrics, dermatology and contact dermatitis.
Smith DR
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Sep; 59(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 18759892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
Sala SD; Brooks J
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neutralizing the impact factor culture.
Notkins AL
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The impact factor: pros and cons].
Gonzalo Sanz LM
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1995; 39(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 9499835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Closing remark to this year's discussion on the significance of impact factor for the evaluation of publication activity].
Spála M
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 17323624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [There is nothing better than impact factor and citation rate].
Svacina S
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(12):966; discussion 967. PubMed ID: 17323623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
