BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18414870)

  • 1. Comparison of pineapple juice and mannitol as oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance enterography.
    Zulkifle AF; Siti Soraya AR; Hamzaini AH
    Med J Malaysia; 2023 Nov; 78(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 38031220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral CT Contrast Agents: What's New and Why, From the
    Heimer MM; Sun Y; Bonitatibus PJ; Yeh BM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37877595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
    Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in CT enterography.
    Wong J; Roger M; Moore H
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25345816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Lim BK; Bux SI; Rahmat K; Lam SY; Liew YW
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
    Sun XG; Huang G; Liu JJ; Wan LR
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Mannitol, Water, and Iodine-Based Oral Contrast in the Evaluation of the Bowel by Multi-Detector Computed Tomography.
    Thati SS; Nagegowda R; Sakalecha AK; Savagave SG; Patil DT
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24316. PubMed ID: 35607530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel food-based negative oral contrast agent compared with two conventional oral contrast agents in abdominal CT: a three-arm parallel blinded randomised controlled single-centre trial.
    Leander P; Stathis G; Casal-Dujat L; Boman K; Adnerhill I; Marsal J; Böök O; Fork T
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 Apr; 6(1):15. PubMed ID: 35378633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preprocedural fasting for contrast-enhanced CT: when experience meets evidence.
    Liu H; Liu Y; Zhao L; Li X; Zhang W
    Insights Imaging; 2021 Dec; 12(1):180. PubMed ID: 34865183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.
    Coccolini F; Kobayashi L; Kluger Y; Moore EE; Ansaloni L; Biffl W; Leppaniemi A; Augustin G; Reva V; Wani I; Kirkpatrick A; Abu-Zidan F; Cicuttin E; Fraga GP; Ordonez C; Pikoulis E; Sibilla MG; Maier R; Matsumura Y; Masiakos PT; Khokha V; Mefire AC; Ivatury R; Favi F; Manchev V; Sartelli M; Machado F; Matsumoto J; Chiarugi M; Arvieux C; Catena F; Coimbra R;
    World J Emerg Surg; 2019; 14():56. PubMed ID: 31867050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT.
    Sheafor DH; Kovacs MD; Burchett P; Picard MM; Davis B; Hardie AD
    Radiol Med; 2018 Dec; 123(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 30084109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease.
    Kim SH
    Intest Res; 2015 Jan; 13(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25691841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement of distension and mural visualization of bowel loops using neutral oral contrasts in abdominal computed tomography.
    Hashemi J; Davoudi Y; Taghavi M; Pezeshki Rad M; Moghadam AM
    World J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 6(12):907-12. PubMed ID: 25550995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the use of oral contrast media in abdominopelvic CT.
    Buttigieg EL; Grima KB; Cortis K; Soler SG; Zarb F
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2936-44. PubMed ID: 25027836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative and qualitative bowel analysis using mannitol, water and iodine-based endoluminal contrast agent on 64-row detector CT.
    Prakashini K; Kakkar C; Sambhaji C; Shetty CM; Rao VR
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 23(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 24604944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Lee CH; Haaland B; Earnest A; Tan CH
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2513-21. PubMed ID: 23624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mechanical obstruction as a cause of acute abdomen. Radiological differential diagnosis].
    Körner M; Linsenmaier U; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2010 Mar; 50(3):226, 228-36. PubMed ID: 20165939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.
    Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.