These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18415735)

  • 21. Normative data on nasalance scores for Farsi speaking children: Influence of age, gender and phonetic context.
    Saber-Moghadam R; Faham M; Ghavami FS; Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109680. PubMed ID: 31536853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Normal nasalance for the German language. Nasometric values for clinical use in patients with cleft lip and palate].
    Küttner C; Schönweiler R; Seeberger B; Dempf R; Lisson J; Ptok M
    HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12589422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intonation features of the expression of emotions in Spanish: preliminary study for a prosody assessment procedure.
    Martínez-Castilla P; Peppé S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):363-70. PubMed ID: 18415736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure.
    Zheng Y; Meng ZL; Wang K; Tao Y; Xu K; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 19726935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance for a Mandarin population.
    Kim HK; Yu XM; Cao YJ; Liu XM; Huang ZM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 26853731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normative nasalance data in Ugandan english-speaking children.
    Luyten A; D'haeseleer E; Hodges A; Galiwango G; Budolfsen T; Vermeersch H; Van Lierde K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22627117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Voice low tone to high tone ratio, nasalance, and nasality ratings in connected speech of native Mandarin speakers: a pilot study.
    Tsai YJ; Wang CP; Lee GS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Jul; 49(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 21740178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women.
    Whitehill TL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11294539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical use of AEVP- and AERP-measures in childhood speech disorders.
    Maassen B; Pasman J; Nijland L; Rotteveel J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):125-34. PubMed ID: 16428228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nasalance distance and ratio: two new measures.
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Whitehill TL; Awan SN; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 May; 37(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 10830803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
    Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD; Kummer AW; Alrawashdeh M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 28879790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers.
    El-Kassabi RM; Hassan S; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Alfaris A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Jul; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24854781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of Nasalance Scores Without Touching the Philtrum for Better Comfort During Speech Assessment and Therapy: A Preliminary Study.
    Yang X; Pratama GB; Choi Y; You H; Tâm NPM; Kim GW; Jo YJ; Ko MH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Apr; 58(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 32924600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Normal Patterns of Nasometric Values in Adult Jordanian Speakers of Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2043-2047. PubMed ID: 30015743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech prosody in affective contexts in Thai patients with right hemisphere lesions.
    Gandour J; Larsen J; Dechongkit S; Ponglorpisit S; Khunadorn F
    Brain Lang; 1995 Dec; 51(3):422-43. PubMed ID: 8719075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The development of articulatory signatures in children.
    Singh L; Singh NC
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 18576954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores.
    Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating Nasalance Values Among Bilingual Mandarin-English Speakers.
    Pua E; Holt Y; Kollara L; Rangarathnam B; Fang X; Perry JL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Apr; 56(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 30099917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical analysis of the impact of glottal features in the classification of clinical depression in speech.
    Moore E; Clements MA; Peifer JW; Weisser L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 18232351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.