These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18415735)

  • 41. Normative nasalance scores in Tamil-speaking Indian children.
    Pokharel A; Naina P; Sebastain S; Syed KA; John M; Varghese AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2022 Apr; 47(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 33269640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm?
    Barry W; Andreeva B; Koreman J
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):78-94. PubMed ID: 19390232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Voice low tone to high tone ratio: a potential quantitative index for vowel [a:] and its nasalization.
    Lee GS; Wang CP; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 16830950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Changes in vocal resonance and nasalization following adenoidectomy in normal children: preliminary findings.
    Andreassen ML; Leeper HA; MacRae DL
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Aug; 20(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 1920574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Normative Data and Dialectical Effects on Nasalance in Flemish Adults.
    D'haeseleer E; Bettens K; De Mets S; De Moor V; Van Lierde K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 25998177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic analysis of the speech of children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study.
    Liker M; Mildner V; Sindija B
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jan; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17364613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm?
    Wiget L; White L; Schuppler B; Grenon I; Rauch O; Mattys SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1559-69. PubMed ID: 20329856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. NASALANCE SCORES IN LEBANESE ENGLISH-SPEAKING ADULTS USING NASOMETRIC ANALYSIS.
    Hamdan AL; Ziade G; Jabbour J; Khneizer G; Kutkut I
    J Med Liban; 2015; 63(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 26821403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Nasalance in Arabic-Speaking Jordanians: A Comparative Study.
    Odeh OM; Madison CL; Riski JE
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2020; 72(5):370-377. PubMed ID: 31505489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Turkish population.
    Karakoc O; Akcam T; Birkent H; Arslan HH; Gerek M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 23524731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Velopharyngeal function in adult speakers of Portuguese diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitorino J
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 25(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 20037221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative measurement of speech sound distortions due to inadequate dental mounting.
    Drăgănescu GE; Sinescu C; Dodenciu D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16880154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Artificial neural network analysis to assess hypernasality in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
    de Bruijn M; ten Bosch L; Kuik DJ; Langendijk JA; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw I
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 21864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children.
    Van der Heijden P; Hobbel HH; Van der Laan BF; Korsten-Meijer AG; Goorhuis-Brouwer SM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 75(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 21242004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Measurement of nasal airflow and aerophonoscopy].
    Blot P; Khonsari RH
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 19327801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12498604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantitative measurement of speech sound distortions with the aid of minimum variance spectral estimation method for dentistry use.
    Bereteu L; Drăgănescu GE; Stănescu D; Sinescu C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Dec; 14(12):1097-104. PubMed ID: 21442488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population.
    Mishima K; Sugii A; Yamada T; Imura H; Sugahara T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 36(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 17988887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speech stimuli and nasalance scores for the assessment of resonance in in Mandarin speaking Malaysian children.
    Mohd Ibrahim H; Lim HW; Ahmad Rusli Y; Lim CT
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 Jun; 34(6):554-565. PubMed ID: 31537131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.