These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18415737)

  • 1. Perception and confusion of speech sounds by adults with a cochlear implant.
    Rødvik AK
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):371-8. PubMed ID: 18415737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory/visual speech perception by cochlear implant users and hearing aid wearers.
    Danhauer JL; Erratt JD; Edgerton BJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Sep; 7(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 3789122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytic importance of the coding features for the discrimination of vowels in the cochlear implant signal.
    Berger-Vachon C; Gallego S; Morgon A; Truy E
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():351-3. PubMed ID: 7668702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition with the advanced combination encoder and transient emphasis spectral maxima strategies in nucleus 24 recipients.
    Holden LK; Vandali AE; Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):681-701. PubMed ID: 16197281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consonant confusions in white noise.
    Phatak SA; Lovitt A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1220-33. PubMed ID: 18681609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel discrimination with the single-electrode cochlear implant: a pilot study.
    Dent LJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):41-6. PubMed ID: 6805396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consonant and vowel confusions in well-performing adult cochlear implant users, measured with a nonsense syllable repetition test.
    Rødvik AK; Torkildsen JVK; Wie OB; Tvete O; Skaug I; Silvola JT
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 36853200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants.
    Mildner V; Liker M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):845-56. PubMed ID: 18608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consonant and Vowel Confusions in Well-Performing Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants, Measured by a Nonsense Syllable Repetition Test.
    Rødvik AK; Tvete O; Torkildsen JVK; Wie OB; Skaug I; Silvola JT
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1813. PubMed ID: 31474900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis and synthesis of speech regarding cochlear implant.
    Carrat R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():85-94. PubMed ID: 6596855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships between speech production and speech perception skills in young cochlear-implant users.
    Tye-Murray N; Spencer L; Gilbert-Bedia E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2454-60. PubMed ID: 7593929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness.
    Klop WM; Briaire JJ; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1982-7. PubMed ID: 17767086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of signal processing by the House-3M cochlear implant on consonant perception.
    Edgerton BJ; Brimacombe JA
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():115-23. PubMed ID: 6596834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What should be implemented in future cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():268-75. PubMed ID: 2356735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.