These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18415737)

  • 21. [Intelligibility of French consonants after partial supra-cricoid laryngectomy].
    Crevier-Buchman L; Vaissiere J; Maeda S; Brasnu D
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 12741291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic analysis of consonants in whispered speech.
    Jovicić ST; Sarić Z
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 17014986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The mechanism of speech perception in patients with a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Sakakihara J
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1994 Aug; 19(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 7994894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhancing the speech envelope of continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2476-84. PubMed ID: 10212428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Indication of a relation between speech perception and temporal resolution for cochlear implantees.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Kasper A; Montandon P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):893-5. PubMed ID: 1746822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The discrimination rate in the consonant by cochlear implanted].
    Zhang L; Zhang DX; Zhang XH; Zhang WJ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 May; 14(5):197-8. PubMed ID: 12541540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Segmental duration in Parkinsonian French speech.
    Duez D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 19590223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds.
    Schorr EA; Roth FP; Fox NA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 18664684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consonant and vowel confusions in well-performing adult cochlear implant users, measured with a nonsense syllable repetition test.
    Rødvik AK; Torkildsen JVK; Wie OB; Tvete O; Skaug I; Silvola JT
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 36853200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Information transmission with an eight channel bipolar cochlear implant. Acoustic simulation experiments.
    van Durme M; Bosiers W; Peeters S; Marquet J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 3841452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.