These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1841576)

  • 1. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Katz J; Sommer A; Gaasterland DE; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Dec; 109(12):1684-9. PubMed ID: 1841576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Full Threshold vs. SITA in glaucomatous patients undergoing automated perimetry for the first time].
    Schimiti RB; Arcieri ES; Avelino RR; Matsuo T; Costa VP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16699660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
    Asman P; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 110(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 1596230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1252-4. PubMed ID: 3046588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated differential threshold perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Duggan C; Sommer A; Auer C; Burkhard K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1985 Sep; 100(3):420-3. PubMed ID: 4037029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glaucoma detection with damato multifixation campimetry online.
    Olsen AS; Alberti M; Serup L; la Cour M; Damato B; Kolko M
    Eye (Lond); 2016 May; 30(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 26987590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac.
    Zalta AH; Burchfield JC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1990 May; 74(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 2354137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes.
    Maeda H; Nakaura M; Negi A
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Oct; 14 Pt 5():747-51. PubMed ID: 11116697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problems related to diffuse versus localized loss in the perimetry of glaucomatous visual fields.
    Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F; Weale RA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 1597291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.
    Shah NN; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Hoffmann EM; Zangwill LM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1593-602. PubMed ID: 16949444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.