These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1841576)

  • 21. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
    Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Trible JR; Schultz RO; Robinson JC; Rothe TL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 129(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 10926982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry.
    Sponsel WE; Arango S; Trigo Y; Mensah J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):830-6. PubMed ID: 9645720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening with automated perimetry using a threshold-related three-level algorithm.
    Kosoko O; Sommer A; Auer C
    Ophthalmology; 1986 Jul; 93(7):882-6. PubMed ID: 3763132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of an LCD-Based Visual Field System.
    Joo JH; Lee J; You H; Kang J
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 33(3):e19. PubMed ID: 29215806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with automated threshold perimetry.
    Sommer A; Enger C; Witt K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 103(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 3578465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.