180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18416417)
1. Biological space adaptation to implant dimensions.
Sarment DP; Meraw SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18416417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.
Leonard G; Coelho P; Polyzois I; Stassen L; Claffey N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 19397634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crestal bone loss minimized when following the crestal preparation protocol: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Novaes AB; de Oliveira RR; Taba Júnior M; de Souza SL; Palioto DB; Grisi MF; Papalexiou V
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):276-82. PubMed ID: 16447900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs.
Parr GR; Steflik DE; Sisk AL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):534-40. PubMed ID: 8112793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs.
Akimoto K; Becker W; Persson R; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 10379108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of bone condensation and crestal preparation on the bone response to implants designed for immediate loading: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB; Taba M; de Souza SL; Papalexiou V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 17340898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants.
Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 19397633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible.
Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18299237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: bone healing in four different implant systems.
de Sanctis M; Vignoletti F; Discepoli N; Zucchelli G; Sanz M
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 19549213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of static overload on the bony interface around implants in dogs.
Miyamoto Y; Koretake K; Hirata M; Kubo T; Akagawa Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 18950068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Biologic width"and crestal bone remodeling with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants: a study in dogs.
Deporter D; Al-Sayyed A; Pilliar RM; Valiquette N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 18700381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flapless implant surgery: an experimental study.
Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jung JH; Lee HJ; Lee SH; Engelke W
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jul; 104(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17376716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study.
Calvo-Guirado JL; Ortiz-Ruiz AJ; López-Marí L; Delgado-Ruiz R; Maté-Sánchez J; Bravo Gonzalez LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 19492643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of implant diameter on surrounding bone.
Brink J; Meraw SJ; Sarment DP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 17590162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.
Becker J; Ferrari D; Herten M; Kirsch A; Schaer A; Schwarz F
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Dec; 34(12):1089-96. PubMed ID: 17953691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone.
Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
