150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18416440)
1. Measurement error correction for nutritional exposures with correlated measurement error: use of the method of triads in a longitudinal setting.
Rosner B; Michels KB; Chen YH; Day NE
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3466-89. PubMed ID: 18416440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal allocation of resources in a biomarker setting.
Rosner B; Hendrickson S; Willett W
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 25346516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using surrogate biomarkers to improve measurement error models in nutritional epidemiology.
Keogh RH; White IR; Rodwell SA
Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3838-61. PubMed ID: 23553407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman L; Bingham S; Day NE; Riboli E; Ferrari P; Carroll RJ
Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6A):915-23. PubMed ID: 12633516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk.
Bingham SA; Welch AA; McTaggart A; Mulligan AA; Runswick SA; Luben R; Oakes S; Khaw KT; Wareham N; Day NE
Public Health Nutr; 2001 Jun; 4(3):847-58. PubMed ID: 11415493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between estimated and true dietary intakes: using two instrumental variables.
Fraser GE; Butler TL; Shavlik D
Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 15(7):509-18. PubMed ID: 16029843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer.
Rosner B; Gore R
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Nov; 154(9):827-35. PubMed ID: 11682365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire to determine vitamin D intakes using the method of triads.
Weir RR; Carson EL; Mulhern MS; Laird E; Healy M; Pourshahidi LK
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2016 Apr; 29(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 26249157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allowing for never and episodic consumers when correcting for error in food record measurements of dietary intake.
Keogh RH; White IR
Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):624-36. PubMed ID: 21378386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of three food frequency questionnaires to assess dietary calcium intake in adults.
Sebring NG; Denkinger BI; Menzie CM; Yanoff LB; Parikh SJ; Yanovski JA
J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 May; 107(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 17467370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications.
Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Bingham S; Schatzkin A; Subar A; Carroll RJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 153(4):394-403. PubMed ID: 11207158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort.
McKeown NM; Day NE; Welch AA; Runswick SA; Luben RN; Mulligan AA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA
Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 74(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 11470719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear measurement error models with restricted sampling.
Gorfine M; Lipshtat N; Freedman LS; Prentice RL
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 17447938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of a repeat-measure biomarker measurement error model to 2 validation studies: examination of the effect of within-person variation in biomarker measurements.
Preis SR; Spiegelman D; Zhao BB; Moshfegh A; Baer DJ; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):683-94. PubMed ID: 21343245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire and stability of dietary habits determined from five annually repeated measurements.
Goldbohm RA; van 't Veer P; van den Brandt PA; van 't Hof MA; Brants HA; Sturmans F; Hermus RJ
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jun; 49(6):420-9. PubMed ID: 7656885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Folate intake assessment: validation of a new approach.
Yen J; Zoumas-Morse C; Pakiz B; Rock CL
J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Aug; 103(8):991-1000; discussion 1000. PubMed ID: 12891147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology.
Keogh RH; White IR
Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2137-55. PubMed ID: 24497385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the EPIC food-frequency questionnaire be used in adolescent populations?
Lietz G; Barton KL; Longbottom PJ; Anderson AS
Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 12570886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
