118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18416612)
1. Polymerization efficiency of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives under molar bands.
Rejman DJ; Eliades T; Bradley TG; Eliades G
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):549-52. PubMed ID: 18416612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.
Newman GV; Newman RA; Sengupta AK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 11244420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strength properties of visible-light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
Kerby RE; Knobloch L; Thakur A
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9484165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced degree of monomer conversion of orthodontic adhesives using a glass-fiber layer under the bracket.
Shinya M; Shinya A; Lassila LV; Varrela J; Vallittu PK
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):546-50. PubMed ID: 19413394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10672216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of light-cure initiation time on polymerization efficiency and orthodontic bond strength with a resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Thomas JT; Roberts HW; Diaz L; Bradley TG; Berzins DW
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 May; 15(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of intraoral aging on the setting status of resin composite and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives.
Iliadi A; Baumgartner S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades T; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 24703280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions.
Pithon MM; Dos Santos RL; de Oliveira MV; Ruellas AC; Romano FL
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 16808580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bond strengths of two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cements under different surface conditions.
BĂ©ress A; Tjan AH; Schlenker WL; Wongsrimongkol T
J Clin Orthod; 1998 May; 32(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 9852841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding of light-cured glass ionomer cement to polycarbonate resin treated with experimental primers.
Fujita N; Itoh T; Matsumoto M; Caputo AA
Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 11036995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of time on the flexural strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives.
Azevedo C; Forestier JP; Tavernier B
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 15747826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage under ceramic and metallic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer.
Ramoglu SI; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ertas H
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 19123712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]