These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18416679)

  • 1. Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.
    Tsai CC; Kuo WJ; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2015-24. PubMed ID: 18416679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G; Prinz W; Wascher E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):859-70. PubMed ID: 16768383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs in anterior and posterior regions associated with duration and size discriminations.
    Gontier E; Paul I; Le Dantec C; Pouthas V; Jean-Marie G; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):668-78. PubMed ID: 19702420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.
    Zhou Z; Yu R; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3606-13. PubMed ID: 20727905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?
    Welsh TN; Higgins L; Ray M; Weeks DJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Dec; 26(6):853-66. PubMed ID: 17937970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials.
    Boulinguez P; Ballanger B; Granjon L; Benraiss A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 19329359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in gamma-band power and phase synchronization with the difficulty of a visual oddball task.
    Kim KH; Yoon J; Kim JH; Jung KY
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():105-12. PubMed ID: 18723005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types.
    Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of brief imitative experience on EEG desynchronization during action observation.
    Marshall PJ; Bouquet CA; Shipley TF; Young T
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2100-6. PubMed ID: 19467360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity.
    Czigler I; Pató L
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19111891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
    Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.