These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18416747)

  • 1. Factors influencing efficiency of sliding mechanics to close extraction space: a systematic review.
    Barlow M; Kula K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 18416747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic space closure in sliding mechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sebastian B; Bhuvaraghan A; Thiruvenkatachari B
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34609513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Miles PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 17693373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach.
    Giancotti A; Greco M
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific evidence for pre-adjusted edgewise mechanics.
    Mandall NA; Malik O
    Dent Update; 2007; 34(1):45-6, 48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 17348558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure.
    Nightingale C; Jones SP
    J Orthod; 2003 Sep; 30(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 14530421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical study of space closure with nickel-titanium closed coil springs and an elastic module.
    Samuels RH; Rudge SJ; Mair LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 9674684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A "typodont" study of rate of orthodontic space closure: self-ligating systems vs. conventional systems.
    Saporito I; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Minerva Stomatol; 2011; 60(11-12):555-65. PubMed ID: 22210459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ion implantation of TMA archwires on the rate of orthodontic sliding space closure.
    Kula K; Phillips C; Gibilaro A; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Nov; 114(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 9810054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment.
    Ribeiro GL; Jacob HB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 27275623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical modification in root correction phase in segmented arch technique.
    Filho DI; Bernardo KF; Calheta AP; Vieira ES
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16548307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
    Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium springs vs elastomeric chains in orthodontic space closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mohammed H; Rizk MZ; Wafaie K; Almuzian M
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29265578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.
    Yang X; Xue C; He Y; Zhao M; Luo M; Wang P; Bai D
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29101414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.