These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18417386)

  • 21. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Association of Gonial Angle on Panoramic Radiograph with the Facial Divergence on Lateral Cephalogram.
    Abdul Rehman S; Rizwan S; Shah Faisal S; Sheeraz Hussain S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2020 Apr; 30(4):355-358. PubMed ID: 32513351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Tozoğlu U; Cakur B
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Sep; 36(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 24292424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting lower third molar eruption on panoramic radiographs after cephalometric comparison of profile and panoramic radiographs.
    Begtrup A; Grønastøð HÁ; Christensen IJ; Kjær I
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 22474212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with Class I malocclusion.
    Shahabi M; Ramazanzadeh BA; Mokhber N
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Sep; 51(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 19776510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical bone densitometric evaluation of the mandible in removable denture wearers dependent on the morphology of the mandibular cortex.
    Zlatarić DK; Celebić A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 12869976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital Radiographic Study of Gonial angle in Forensic Odontology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
    Srii R; Koju S; Mahanta SK; Marla V; Niroula D; Upadhyaya C; Murthy PS
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 Apr; 59(236):350-355. PubMed ID: 34508539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Influence of the Mandibular Gonial Angle on the Incidence of Mandibular Angle Fracture-A Radiomorphometric Study.
    Panneerselvam E; Prasad PJ; Balasubramaniam S; Somasundaram S; Raja KV; Srinivasan D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 27643630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs.
    Dutra V; Devlin H; Susin C; Yang J; Horner K; Fernandes AR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 17052644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study.
    Sharan A; Madjar D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 18416412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of Gonial Angle Measurements Using Panoramic Imaging versus Lateral Cephalograms in Adults with Different Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
    Tashkandi NE; Alnaqa NH; Al-Saif NM; Allam E
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2024; 17():1923-1929. PubMed ID: 38706500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relationship between clinical denture tooth abrasion and morphologic features of the mandible.
    Jooste CH; Harris AM; Adams LP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 7699595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of radiographic predictors to assess the rate of mandibular residual ridge resorption.
    Mahapatra GK; Nar OP; Joshi SN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2004; 15(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15682792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?
    Gümrükçü Z; Balaban E; Karabağ M
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jan; 37(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 31925627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas.
    Wilding RJ; Levin I; Pepper R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Nov; 14(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 3481395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anatomical study of the mandibular angle and body in wide mandibular angle cases.
    Cho IG; Chung JY; Lee JW; Yang JD; Chung HY; Cho BC; Choi KY
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 38(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 25028111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Verification of the symmetry of the mandibular ramus in patients with temporomandibular disorders and asymptomatic individuals: a comparative study.
    Luz JG; Miyazaki LT; Rodrigues L
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2002; 44(3):83-7. PubMed ID: 12784583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the gonial angle in the Anatolian populations: from past to present.
    Gungor K; Sagir M; Ozer I
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Jun; 31(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 17847912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender.
    Ohm E; Silness J
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Nov; 26(11):883-91. PubMed ID: 10583739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.