BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1841811)

  • 1. [Structural changes in valve prostheses].
    Minarini M; Maizza AF; Thiene G
    Cardiologia; 1991 Dec; 36(12 Suppl 1):91-6. PubMed ID: 1841811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dysfunctions of heart valve prostheses and their surgical treatment].
    Sadeghi H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 117(43):1665-70. PubMed ID: 3321421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
    Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
    Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
    Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses, 1980 to 1983.
    Schoen FJ; Hobson CE
    Hum Pathol; 1985 Jun; 16(6):549-59. PubMed ID: 3997132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research on biological and mechanical heart valves: experimental studies in chronic animal models.
    Meuris B
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2002; 64(4):287-302. PubMed ID: 12416236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
    Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioprosthetic heart valve failure: pathology and pathogenesis.
    Schoen FJ; Levy RJ
    Cardiol Clin; 1984 Nov; 2(4):717-39. PubMed ID: 6400011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years].
    Hanania G; Michel PL; Montély JM; Warembourg H; Nardi O; Leguerrier A; Agnino A; Despins P; Legault B; Petit H; Bouraindeloup M;
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Jan; 97(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15002704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: a prospective five-year study.
    Avila WS; Rossi EG; Grinberg M; Ramires JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):864-9. PubMed ID: 12479290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
    Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR; von Lipinski O; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Ling H; Fradet GJ; Chan F; Germann E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1301-8. PubMed ID: 15942570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioprosthetic heart valves: modes of failure.
    Siddiqui RF; Abraham JR; Butany J
    Histopathology; 2009 Aug; 55(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 19694820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.