177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18418291)
1. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review.
Marrazzo JM; Scholes D
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S28-33. PubMed ID: 18418291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to asymptomatic young men and their providers.
Marrazzo JM; Ellen JM; Kent C; Gaydos C; Chapin J; Dunne EF; Rietmeijer CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Mar; 34(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 16924180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Men's attitudes towards chlamydia screening: a narrative review.
Balfe M; Brugha R; O'Connell E; Vaughan D; O'Donovan D
Sex Health; 2012 May; 9(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 22498155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in the human immunodeficiency virus clinic--high yields and high acceptability.
Soni S; White JA
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1107-9. PubMed ID: 22082720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening asymptomatic adolescent men for Chlamydia trachomatis in school-based health centers using urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests.
Joffe A; Rietmeijer CA; Chung SE; Willard N; Chapin JB; Lloyd LV; Waterfield GA; Ellen JM; Gaydos C
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S19-23. PubMed ID: 18716568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A service evaluation comparing home-based testing to clinic-based testing for Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Birmingham and Solihull.
Banerjee P; Thorley N; Radcliffe K
Int J STD AIDS; 2018 Sep; 29(10):974-979. PubMed ID: 29690825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.
Reagan MM; Xu H; Shih SL; Secura GM; Peipert JF
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Nov; 39(11):842-7. PubMed ID: 23064532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening and genotyping of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from male and female clients of youth-health centers in Stockholm County.
Sylvan SP; Von Krogh G; Tiveljung A; Siwerth BM; Henriksson L; Norén L; Asp AK; Grillner L
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Jul; 29(7):379-86. PubMed ID: 12170125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of Chlamydia trachomatis testing and follow-up at a University Hospital Medical Center.
Bachmann LH; Richey CM; Waites K; Schwebke JR; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Oct; 26(9):496-9. PubMed ID: 10534201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium in asymptomatic patients under 30 years of age screened in a French sexually transmitted infections clinic.
Clarivet B; Picot E; Marchandin H; Tribout V; Rachedi N; Schwartzentruber E; Ledésert B; Dereure O; Guillot B; Picot MC
Eur J Dermatol; 2014; 24(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 25322708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in an anonymous and confidential HIV counseling and testing site: feasibility and prevalence rates.
Hamel MJ; Judson FN; Rietmeijer CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2001 Mar; 28(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 11289197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chlamydia trachomatis positivity rates among men tested in selected venues in the United States: a review of the recent literature.
Rietmeijer CA; Hopkins E; Geisler WM; Orr DP; Kent CK
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S8-S18. PubMed ID: 18449072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What about the men?
Dunne EF; Gift TL; Stamm WE
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S1-2. PubMed ID: 18813144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptability of self-taken vaginal swabs and first-catch urine samples for the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with an amplified DNA assay in young women attending a public health sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Hoebe CJ; Rademaker CW; Brouwers EE; ter Waarbeek HL; van Bergen JE
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Aug; 33(8):491-5. PubMed ID: 16547452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the acceptability, barriers and facilitators for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening in technical colleges: qualitative process evaluation of the "Test n Treat" trial.
Fleming C; Drennan VM; Kerry-Barnard S; Reid F; Adams EJ; Sadiq ST; Phillips R; Majewska W; Harding-Esch EM; Cousins EC; Yoward F; Oakeshott P
BMC Public Health; 2020 Aug; 20(1):1212. PubMed ID: 32770977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developments in the screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review.
Kohl KS; Markowitz LE; Koumans EH
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2003 Dec; 30(4):637-58. PubMed ID: 14719842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the second British national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles: respondent uptake and treatment outcomes.
McCadden A; Fenton KA; McManus S; Mercer CH; Erens B; Carder C; Ridgway G; Macdowall W; Nanchahal K; Byron CL; Copas A; Wellings K; Johnson AM
Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Jun; 32(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 15912087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outreach sexual infection screening and postal tests in men who have sex with men: are they comparable to clinic screening?
Wood M; Ellks R; Grobicki M
Int J STD AIDS; 2015 May; 26(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 24912535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
