BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18419518)

  • 1. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood.
    Revell LJ; Collar DC
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1090-100. PubMed ID: 19154380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolution of substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters.
    Lartillot N; Poujol R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):729-44. PubMed ID: 20926596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
    Laurin M
    Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2012 Feb; 179(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 22218305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods.
    Ives AR; Midford PE; Garland T
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):252-70. PubMed ID: 17464881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
    Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
    Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics.
    Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration.
    González-José R; Van Der Molen S; González-Pérez E; Hernández M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jan; 123(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 14669238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear selection and the evolution of variances and covariances for continuous characters in an anole.
    Revell LJ; Mahler DL; Sweeney JR; Sobotka M; Fancher VE; Losos JB
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Feb; 23(2):407-21. PubMed ID: 20039998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies.
    Harmon LJ; Losos JB
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2705-10. PubMed ID: 16526516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 17558967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogeny, regression, and the allometry of physiological traits.
    O'Connor MP; Agosta SJ; Hansen F; Kemp SJ; Sieg AE; McNair JN; Dunham AE
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 17879193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of the phenotypic covariance matrix: evidence for selection and drift in Melanoplus.
    Roff DA; Mousseau T
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 16033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies.
    Adams DC; Collyer ML
    Evolution; 2009 May; 63(5):1143-54. PubMed ID: 19210539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice.
    Stinchcombe JR; Rutter MT; Burdick DS; Tiffin P; Rausher MD; Mauricio R
    Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 18707526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.
    Price T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1997 Apr; 352(1352):519-29. PubMed ID: 9163825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation.
    Revell LJ; Graham Reynolds R
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2697-707. PubMed ID: 22946797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction.
    Maddison WP; Midford PE; Otto SP
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):701-10. PubMed ID: 17849325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary divergence in directions of high phenotypic variance in the ostracode genus poseidonamicus.
    Hunt G
    Evolution; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1560-76. PubMed ID: 17598740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.