These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18419587)

  • 1. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Models of quantitative estimations: rule-based and exemplar-based processes compared.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):867-89. PubMed ID: 19586258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong.
    Svenson O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17936234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
    Nilsson H; Winman A; Juslin P; Hansson G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 19883134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use.
    Pachur T; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
    Cobos PL; Almaraz J; García-Madruga JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
    Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning heuristics across the psychosis continuum: the contribution of hypersalient evidence-hypothesis matches.
    Balzan R; Delfabbro P; Galletly C; Woodward T
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2012; 17(5):431-50. PubMed ID: 22384982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events.
    Pachur T; Biele G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16904059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
    Hogarth RM; Karelaia N
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.
    Moore AB; Clark BA; Kane MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 18578844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.