232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18419669)
1. Quantitative risk assessment from farm to fork and beyond: a global Bayesian approach concerning food-borne diseases.
Albert I; Grenier E; Denis JB; Rousseau J
Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):557-71. PubMed ID: 18419669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three modelling approaches for quantitative risk assessment using the case study of Salmonella spp. in poultry meat.
Parsons DJ; Orton TG; D'Souza J; Moore A; Jones R; Dodd CE
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Jan; 98(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 15617799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Monitoring and risk assessment of campylobacter infections].
Bartelt E
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 Aug; 111(8):326-31. PubMed ID: 15469062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative risk assessment of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. and cross-contamination during handling of raw broiler chickens evaluating strategies at the producer level to reduce human campylobacteriosis in Sweden.
Lindqvist R; Lindblad M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 121(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 18037525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of results of microbiological analyses for risk-based control of Listeria monocytogenes in marinated broiler legs.
Aarnisalo K; Vihavainen E; Rantala L; Maijala R; Suihko ML; Hielm S; Tuominen P; Ranta J; Raaska L
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 121(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 18155311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat.
Nauta M; Hill A; Rosenquist H; Brynestad S; Fetsch A; van der Logt P; Fazil A; Christensen B; Katsma E; Borck B; Havelaar A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):107-23. PubMed ID: 19136176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-contamination during food preparation: a mechanistic model applied to chicken-borne Campylobacter.
Mylius SD; Nauta MJ; Havelaar AH
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):803-13. PubMed ID: 17958493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying human health risks from virginiamycin used in chickens.
Cox LA; Popken DA
Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):271-88. PubMed ID: 15028017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis related to the consumption of chicken meat in two Italian regions.
Calistri P; Giovannini A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):274-87. PubMed ID: 18842315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A risk assessment model for Campylobacter in broiler meat.
Nauta MJ; Jacobs-Reitsma WF; Havelaar AH
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):845-61. PubMed ID: 17958496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the frequency and duration of microbial contamination events.
Powell MR
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 16690153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of human health risks from animal antimicrobial use in a dynamic model of emerging resistance.
Cox LA; Popken DA
Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1153-64. PubMed ID: 15563285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Source attribution of food-borne zoonoses in New Zealand: a modified Hald model.
Mullner P; Jones G; Noble A; Spencer SE; Hathaway S; French NP
Risk Anal; 2009 Jul; 29(7):970-84. PubMed ID: 19486473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the differences in public health impact of salmonella subtypes using a bayesian microbial subtyping approach for source attribution.
Pires SM; Hald T
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2010 Feb; 7(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 19877767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Bayesian modelling in risk assessment: application to growth of Listeria monocytogenes and food flora in cold-smoked salmon.
Delignette-Muller ML; Cornu M; Pouillot R; Denis JB
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 106(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 16216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferring an augmented Bayesian network to confront a complex quantitative microbial risk assessment model with durability studies: application to Bacillus cereus on a courgette purée production chain.
Rigaux C; Ancelet S; Carlin F; Nguyen-thé C; Albert I
Risk Anal; 2013 May; 33(5):877-92. PubMed ID: 22967223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A poultry-processing model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment.
Nauta M; van der Fels-Klerx I; Havelaar A
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 15787759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quantitative risk assessment related to microbial food contamination].
Sanaa M; Bemrah N; Meyer S; Cerf O; Mohammed H
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48 Suppl 2():2S11-24. PubMed ID: 11183481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian temporal source attribution of foodborne zoonoses: Campylobacter in Finland and Norway.
Ranta J; Matjushin D; Virtanen T; Kuusi M; Viljugrein H; Hofshagen M; Hakkinen M
Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1156-71. PubMed ID: 21231942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
