190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18419697)
1. Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known?
Vira MA; Guzzo T; Heitjan DF; Tomaszewski JE; D'Amico A; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18419697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is an independent predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Lambert SM; Matsukhani M; Sprenkle PC; McCann TR; Katz AE; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1066-70. PubMed ID: 17784880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density better than the preoperative PSA level in predicting early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy?
Jones TD; Koch MO; Bunde PJ; Cheng L
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 16469012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the time from biopsy to surgery affect biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
Boorjian SA; Bianco FJ; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):773-6. PubMed ID: 16153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigative clinical study on prostate cancer part IX and X: estradiol and the pituitary-testicular-prostate axis at the time of initial diagnosis and subsequent cluster selection of the patient population after radical prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Ghimenton C; Petrozziello A; Sava T; Migliorini F; Romano M; Caruso B; Cocco C; Antoniolli SZ; Lacola V; Rubilotta E; Monaco C
Anticancer Res; 2012 Oct; 32(10):4523-32. PubMed ID: 23060581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The maximum tumour length in biopsy cores as a predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Hayashi N; Urashima M; Kuruma H; Arai Y; Kuwao S; Iwamura M; Egawa S
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 17850362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
