176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18420272)
1. Contribution of the apparent diffusion coefficient in perilesional edema for the assessment of brain tumors.
Guzman R; Altrichter S; El-Koussy M; Gralla J; Weis J; Barth A; Seiler RW; Schroth G; Lövblad KO
J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 35(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 18420272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
Server A; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Josefsen R; Schellhorn T; Kumar T; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation times in characterizing contrast enhancing brain tumors and regions of peritumoral edema.
Oh J; Cha S; Aiken AH; Han ET; Crane JC; Stainsby JA; Wright GA; Dillon WP; Nelson SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 15906339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gradient of apparent diffusion coefficient values in peritumoral edema helps in differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions.
Lemercier P; Paz Maya S; Patrie JT; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 24951211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor extension in high-grade gliomas assessed with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: values and lesion-to-brain ratios of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy.
van Westen D; Lätt J; Englund E; Brockstedt S; Larsson EM
Acta Radiol; 2006 Apr; 47(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 16613314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion tensor imaging provides an insight into the microstructure of meningiomas, high-grade gliomas, and peritumoral edema.
De Belder FE; Oot AR; Van Hecke W; Venstermans C; Menovsky T; Van Marck V; Van Goethem J; Van den Hauwe L; Vandekerckhove M; Parizel PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 22992609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions.
Lee EJ; terBrugge K; Mikulis D; Choi DS; Bae JM; Lee SK; Moon SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21178049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient in vasogenic edema and reactive astrogliosis.
Hagen T; Ahlhelm F; Reiche W
Neuroradiology; 2007 Nov; 49(11):921-6. PubMed ID: 17713762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions.
Sundgren PC; Fan X; Weybright P; Welsh RC; Carlos RC; Petrou M; McKeever PE; Chenevert TL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17071335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The differences of water diffusion between brain tissue infiltrated by tumor and peritumoral vasogenic edema.
Pavlisa G; Rados M; Pavlisa G; Pavic L; Potocki K; Mayer D
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19237051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical analysis of multi-b factor diffusion weighted images can help distinguish between vasogenic and tumor-infiltrated edema.
Vandendries C; Ducreux D; Lacroix C; Ducot B; Saliou G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 40(3):622-9. PubMed ID: 24395290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical relevance of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in assessing intra-axial brain tumors.
Rollin N; Guyotat J; Streichenberger N; Honnorat J; Tran Minh VA; Cotton F
Neuroradiology; 2006 Mar; 48(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 16470375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient be used as a noninvasive parameter to distinguish tumor tissue from peritumoral tissue in cerebral gliomas?
Pauleit D; Langen KJ; Floeth F; Hautzel H; Riemenschneider MJ; Reifenberger G; Shah NJ; Müller HW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 15503327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors.
Kitis O; Altay H; Calli C; Yunten N; Akalin T; Yurtseven T
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Sep; 55(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 16129247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perilesional apparent diffusion coefficient in the preoperative evaluation of glioma grade.
Yazdani M; Rumboldt Z; Tabesh A; Giglio P; Schiarelli C; Morgan PS; Spampinato MV
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():88-94. PubMed ID: 30032069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
