309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18420890)
1. The assessment of publication quality.
Bo LL; Li JB; Deng XM
Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1589-90; author reply 1590. PubMed ID: 18420890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses Published in Leading Anesthesiology Journals From 2005 to 2014.
Hall AM; Lee S; Zurakowski D
Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):2063-2067. PubMed ID: 28448399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
Antes G; von Elm E
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS IN MODERN ANAESTHESIOLOGY].
Osipova NA
Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2015; 60(3):54-6. PubMed ID: 26415299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Situation of medical sciences in 50 top countries from 1996 to 2010--based on quality and quantity of publications.
Jazayeri SB; Alavi A; Rahimi-Movaghar V
Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 22592578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
von Elm E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical appraisal of qualitative research in clinical journals challenged.
Sale JE; Hawker GA
Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Apr; 53(2):314-6. PubMed ID: 15818641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anaesthetic research in the United Kingdom: publishing or perishing?
Pandit JJ
Anaesthesia; 2008 Mar; 63(3):225-7. PubMed ID: 18289227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?
Oh HC; Lim JF
Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):749-51. PubMed ID: 19710968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Academic anaesthesia: the trend in UK publishing in the BJA between 2004 and 2013.
Ward PA
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jul; 113(1):191-2. PubMed ID: 24942719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The dance about the "impact factor"].
Rehfeld JF; Nielsen LB; Jørgensen HL
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2317. PubMed ID: 17594848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse.
Kumar V; Upadhyay S; Medhi B
Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):752-5. PubMed ID: 19710969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years.
Langford RA; Huang GH; Leslie K
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19032695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating research in cardiovascular medicine: citation counts are not sufficient.
McAlister FA; Lawson FM; Good AH; Armstrong PW
Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(9):1038-43. PubMed ID: 21382905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of biomedical research publications and indexation in Pakistan.
Shah SA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Jan; 14(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 14764251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion.
Wells WA
J Cell Biol; 2006 Sep; 174(6):741. PubMed ID: 16954351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can scientific quality be quantified?
Loscalzo J
Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 21382902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [To prioritize the creativeness on the impact factor].
Dosne Pasqualini C
Medicina (B Aires); 2003; 63(4):358-60. PubMed ID: 14518151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Result-based financing of medical research].
Johannessen A; Erik Gilhus N
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Mar; 129(7):638-41. PubMed ID: 19337335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A negative trend of biomedical research in Libya: a bibliometric study.
Benamer HT; Bredan A; Bakoush O
Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 19712216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
