705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18421079)
1. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2.
Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Neider MW; Thayer DW; Wabers HD; White JK; Pugliese AJ; Pugliese MF;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3269-82. PubMed ID: 18421079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
Pirbhai A; Sheidow T; Hooper P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?
Scholl HP; Dandekar SS; Peto T; Bunce C; Xing W; Jenkins S; Bird AC
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 14711724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods and reproducibility of grading optimized digital color fundus photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2 Report Number 2).
Danis RP; Domalpally A; Chew EY; Clemons TE; Armstrong J; SanGiovanni JP; Ferris FL;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4548-54. PubMed ID: 23620429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of age-related macular degeneration using a nonmydriatic digital camera and a standard film fundus camera.
Klein R; Meuer SM; Moss SE; Klein BE; Neider MW; Reinke J
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 122(11):1642-6. PubMed ID: 15534124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: is digital imaging as good as 35-mm film?
van Leeuwen R; Chakravarthy U; Vingerling JR; Brussee C; Hooghart AJ; Mulder PG; de Jong PT
Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1540-4. PubMed ID: 12917169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of stereoscopic digital imaging and slide film photography in the identification of macular degeneration.
Somani R; Tennant M; Rudnisky C; Weis E; Ting A; Eppler J; Greve M; Hinz B; de Leon A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 40(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15947799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-mydriatic digital macular photography: how good is the second eye photograph?
Aung KZ; Robman L; Chong EW; English DR; Giles GG; Guymer RH
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 19874148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Excess lead in the neural retina in age-related macular degeneration.
Erie JC; Good JA; Butz JA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 19733830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography retinal thickness parameters for use in clinical trials for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Keane PA; Liakopoulos S; Jivrajka RV; Chang KT; Alasil T; Walsh AC; Sadda SR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3378-85. PubMed ID: 19264895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial correlation between hyperpigmentary changes on color fundus photography and hyperreflective foci on SDOCT in intermediate AMD.
Folgar FA; Chow JH; Farsiu S; Wong WT; Schuman SG; O'Connell RV; Winter KP; Chew EY; Hwang TS; Srivastava SK; Harrington MW; Clemons TE; Toth CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):4626-33. PubMed ID: 22589439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Population-Based Ultra-Widefield Digital Image Grading Study for Age-Related Macular Degeneration-Like Lesions at the Peripheral Retina.
Lengyel I; Csutak A; Florea D; Leung I; Bird AC; Jonasson F; Peto T
Ophthalmology; 2015 Jul; 122(7):1340-7. PubMed ID: 25870081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization and geographic atrophy in the complications of age-related macular degeneration prevention trial.
Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) Research Group
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1474-9, 1479.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18502512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted, interactive fundus image processing for macular drusen quantitation.
Shin DS; Javornik NB; Berger JW
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1119-25. PubMed ID: 10366080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs.
Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Danis RP; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4717-25. PubMed ID: 21345979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
