1234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18421124)
1. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo treatment planning: a simulation study using dual-energy CT images.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 18068841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation study on potential accuracy gains from dual energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Landry G; Granton PV; Reniers B; Ollers MC; Beaulieu L; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6257-78. PubMed ID: 21896967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Verhaegen F; Devic S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 15798266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extracting atomic numbers and electron densities from a dual source dual energy CT scanner: experiments and a simulation model.
Landry G; Reniers B; Granton PV; van Rooijen B; Beaulieu L; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 21924780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.
Hatton J; McCurdy B; Greer PB
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N329-46. PubMed ID: 19590116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results.
Shikhaliev PM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5595-613. PubMed ID: 18799830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
Guan H; Dong H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assigning nonelastic nuclear interaction cross sections to Hounsfield units for Monte Carlo treatment planning of proton beams.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15798271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electron beam treatment verification using measured and Monte Carlo predicted portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):4977-94. PubMed ID: 16237235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of photon dose calculation algorithms on expected dose distributions in lungs under different respiratory phases.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Winkler P; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2375-90. PubMed ID: 18421117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies.
Wei J; Sandison GA; Hsi WC; Ringor M; Lu X
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5183-97. PubMed ID: 17019032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
