These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18421371)

  • 1. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data.
    Qiu J; Noble WS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Apr; 4(4):e1000054. PubMed ID: 18421371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century.
    Aloy P; Pichaud M; Russell RB
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15718128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes.
    Levy ED; Pereira-Leal JB; Chothia C; Teichmann SA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Nov; 2(11):e155. PubMed ID: 17112313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions.
    Ben-Hur A; Noble WS
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i38-46. PubMed ID: 15961482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs using genomic and proteomic data integration.
    Zhang LV; Wong SL; King OD; Roth FP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():38. PubMed ID: 15090078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.
    Lai FJ; Jhu MH; Chiu CC; Huang YM; Wu WS
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25559499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncovering the structural basis of protein interactions with efficient clustering of 3-D interaction interfaces.
    Aung Z; Tan SH; Ng SK; Tan KL
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():287-97. PubMed ID: 17951832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking.
    Kozakov D; Clodfelter KH; Vajda S; Camacho CJ
    Biophys J; 2005 Aug; 89(2):867-75. PubMed ID: 15908573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces.
    Douguet D; Chen HC; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(21):2612-8. PubMed ID: 16928732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance.
    Zhang B; Park BH; Karpinets T; Samatova NF
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):979-86. PubMed ID: 18304937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BDT: an easy-to-use front-end application for automation of massive docking tasks and complex docking strategies with AutoDock.
    Vaqué M; Arola A; Aliagas C; Pujadas G
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1803-4. PubMed ID: 16720587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural modeling of protein interactions by analogy: application to PSD-95.
    Korkin D; Davis FP; Alber F; Luong T; Shen MY; Lucic V; Kennedy MB; Sali A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Nov; 2(11):e153. PubMed ID: 17096593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consensus contact prediction by linear programming.
    Gao X; Bu D; Li SC; Li M; Xu J
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():323-34. PubMed ID: 17951835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling DNA affinity landscape through two-round support vector regression with weighted degree kernels.
    Wang X; Kuwahara H; Gao X
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S5. PubMed ID: 25605483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partner-aware prediction of interacting residues in protein-protein complexes from sequence data.
    Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29104. PubMed ID: 22194998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction via co-occurring Aligned Pattern Clusters.
    Sze-To A; Fung S; Lee EA; Wong AKC
    Methods; 2016 Nov; 110():26-34. PubMed ID: 27476008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of improved three-dimensional kernel approach to prediction of protein structural class.
    Liu X; Zhang Y; Yang H; Wang L; Liu S
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():625403. PubMed ID: 23878814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating statistical predictions and experimental verifications for enhancing protein-chemical interaction predictions in virtual screening.
    Nagamine N; Shirakawa T; Minato Y; Torii K; Kobayashi H; Imoto M; Sakakibara Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000397. PubMed ID: 19503826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein aggregation in silico.
    Cellmer T; Bratko D; Prausnitz JM; Blanch HW
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jun; 25(6):254-61. PubMed ID: 17433843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues.
    Yan C; Dobbs D; Honavar V
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i371-8. PubMed ID: 15262822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.