These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18421560)

  • 1. [Cohort studies].
    Mathis S; Gartlehner G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2008; 158(5-6):174-9. PubMed ID: 18421560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.
    James MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():167-177. PubMed ID: 33871843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exchangeability in the case-crossover design.
    Mittleman MA; Mostofsky E
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 43(5):1645-55. PubMed ID: 24756878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies.
    Mann CJ
    Emerg Med J; 2003 Jan; 20(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 12533370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.
    Nohr EA; Liew Z
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 29415329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: observational studies with case-control design.
    Martínez D; Papuzinski C; Stojanova J; Arancibia M
    Medwave; 2019 Nov; 19(10):e7716. PubMed ID: 31821315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of cohort study design for cardiovascular nursing research.
    Hood MN
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(6):E1-9. PubMed ID: 19858946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design was found to be highly susceptible to low statistical power and internal validity biases.
    Reeves D; Howells K; Sidaway M; Blakemore A; Hann M; Panagioti M; Bower P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():111-119. PubMed ID: 29277558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to Epidemiological Studies.
    Belbasis L; Bellou V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1793():1-6. PubMed ID: 29876887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Research Methodology 2: Observational Clinical Research.
    Sessler DI; Imrey PB
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 26378704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.
    DiPietro NA
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Oct; 30(10):973-84. PubMed ID: 20874034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cohort Studies: Design, Analysis, and Reporting.
    Wang X; Kattan MW
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S72-S78. PubMed ID: 32658655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal studies 1: Determination of risk.
    Murphy SW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():51-69. PubMed ID: 25694304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.
    Howe CJ; Cole SR; Lau B; Napravnik S; Eron JJ
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26484424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observational studies.
    Peipert JF; Phipps MG
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 41(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 9646956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages and disadvantages of trial designs: a review of analysis methods for ICD studies. AVID Investigators.
    Hallstrom AP; Anderson JL; Cobb LA; Friedman PL; Herre JM; Klein RC; McAnulty J; Steinberg JS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 23(6):1029-38. PubMed ID: 10879390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.