These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18421560)
41. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Thomas BH; Ciliska D; Dobbins M; Micucci S Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 17163895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Sample selection in epidemiologic studies]. Zieliński A Przegl Epidemiol; 2002; 56(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 12608099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research. Mark DH Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion. Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2005; 3(6):1-33. PubMed ID: 27819973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival. Chubak J; Boudreau DM; Wirtz HS; McKnight B; Weiss NS J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Oct; 105(19):1456-62. PubMed ID: 23940288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing? Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Workshop 3--source of bias in case series, patient cohorts, and randomised controlled trials. Yu IT; Tse SL Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Dec; 17(6):478-9. PubMed ID: 22147318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research. Warden G Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():35-52. PubMed ID: 33871837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nested randomized trials in large cohorts and biobanks: studying the health effects of lifestyle factors. Ioannidis JP; Adami HO Epidemiology; 2008 Jan; 19(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 18090999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Research methodology. Dunn WR; Lyman S; Marx R; Arthroscopy; 2003 Oct; 19(8):870-3. PubMed ID: 14551552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs. Reeves BC Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():40-5. PubMed ID: 15353902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Avoidance of bias in cohort studies. Mantel N Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1985 May; 67():169-72. PubMed ID: 3900736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Preparation of data for based on various research--application of statistical methods]. Tango T Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 May; 95(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 9696637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Within-person study designs had lower precision and greater susceptibility to bias because of trends in exposure than cohort and nested case-control designs. Nicholas JM; Grieve AP; Gulliford MC J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 22197519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias. Flanders WD; Ye D Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Review: hybrid designs of cohort studies and case control studies]. Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero M Gac Sanit; 1995; 9(46):42-52. PubMed ID: 8926150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets. John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]