These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842211)

  • 1. Measuring blood cholesterol outside the pathology laboratory: issues of accuracy and reliability.
    Reid CM; Jennings GL; Leonard RF; Conyers RA
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Jun; 15(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1842211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Desk top analysers in general medical practice: how useful are they?
    Leese B; Hutton J
    Med Lab Sci; 1990 Oct; 47(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 2283927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of desk-top cholesterol analysers in general practice.
    Summerton AM; Summerton N
    Public Health; 1995 Sep; 109(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 7480601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Desktop analysers: quality of results obtained by medical office personnel.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    CMAJ; 1988 Mar; 138(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 3345476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two solid phase chemistry systems: Reflotron and Ektachem DT 60.
    Rohac M; Gabl F
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1987 Nov; 25(11):811-21. PubMed ID: 2894403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hospital staff performance when using desk top analysers for "near patient" testing.
    Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 Feb; 41(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 3350985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audit of near patient cholesterol testing in occupational health clinics.
    Majeed FA; Turner HJ; Stuart JM; Cooper RD; Laite PA
    Occup Med (Lond); 1993 Feb; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8422442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three desktop chemistry analyzers for the pediatric practice.
    Hicks JM; Iosefsohn M; Greenberg L
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1991 Apr; 30(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 2025985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the accuracy of the Reflotron system in the field.
    James R; Tyler C; Henrikson D
    Med J Aust; 1988 Aug; 149(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 3398800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinician's guide to the office measurement of cholesterol.
    Burke JJ; Fischer PM
    JAMA; 1988 Jun; 259(23):3444-8. PubMed ID: 3373682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision of a dry-chemistry method of lipid screening.
    Bowden RG; Kingery PM; Long L
    Public Health; 2006 Jun; 120(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 16730036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflotron cholesterol measurement in general practice: accuracy and detection of errors.
    Ball MJ; Robertson IK; Woods M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1994 Nov; 31 ( Pt 6)():556-60. PubMed ID: 7880074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the reflectance method (Reflotron reflectance photometer) with the absorbance method (automatic analysers) for the determination of cholesterol.
    Assmann G; Brinkers H; Schulte H; Carstensen CA
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1989 Dec; 27(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 2614343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus.
    Tanner RK; Fuller KL; Ross ML
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Jun; 109(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 20145946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Reflotron and laboratory cholesterol measurements.
    Kinlay S
    Med J Aust; 1988 Aug; 149(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 3398799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the Reflotron for the determination of plasma cholesterol in capillary blood. Effect of operator variability.
    Bhatnagar D; Durrington PN
    Occup Med (Lond); 1993 May; 43(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8495006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of the Reflotron in the determination of cholesterol.
    Selmer R; Foss OP; Lund-Larsen PG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1990 May; 50(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 2353155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cholesterol screening: comparative evaluation of on-site and laboratory-based measurements.
    Bachorik PS; Rock R; Cloey T; Treciak E; Becker D; Sigmund W
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 2302770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An evaluation of the Reflotron portable analyzer for cholesterol determination in primary care].
    Torres Garrido M; Aragonès Benaiges E; Sarrà Manetas N; Vives Ballester JA; Gutiérrez Mendoza I; Borràs Martínez P; Gómez Sorribes A
    Aten Primaria; 1990 May; 7 Spec No():34-7. PubMed ID: 2104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of EML 105 and advantage analysers measuring capillary versus venous whole blood glucose in neonates.
    McNamara PJ; Sharief N
    Acta Paediatr; 2001 Sep; 90(9):1033-41. PubMed ID: 11683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.