These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18422224)

  • 1. Non-invasive imaging of coronary artery disease.
    Stirrup J; Underwood SR
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Mar; 69(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 18422224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac positron emission tomography imaging.
    Machac J
    Semin Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 35(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 15645392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PET/CT challenge for the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Schwaiger M; Ziegler SI; Nekolla SG
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):494-503. PubMed ID: 20206454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positron emission tomography and molecular imaging.
    Knuuti J; Bengel FM
    Heart; 2008 Mar; 94(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 18276820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the heart: CT and MRI for coronary heart disease.
    Sirineni GK; Stillman AE
    J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17325582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in heart transplant recipients with and without allograft atherosclerosis: a comparison of thallium-201 and technetium 99m sestamibi.
    Rodney RA; Johnson LL; Blood DK; Barr ML
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1994; 13(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 8031797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear perfusion imaging for functional evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: the future is now.
    Mc Ardle B; Ziadi MC; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    Future Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 8(4):603-22. PubMed ID: 22871198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining myocardial perfusion imaging with computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Mahmarian JJ
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 22(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 17762542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic perfusion CT: what is normal myocardial blood flow?
    Saraste A; Knuuti J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 16(3):288-9. PubMed ID: 25378471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.
    AlJaroudi WA; Hage FG
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 26(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 30603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computed tomography of the heart].
    Kristensen TS; Kofoed KF; von der Recke P; Bøttcher M; Nielsen MB; Kelbaek H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Apr; 171(15):1275-81. PubMed ID: 19416618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Arumugam P; Tout D; Tonge C
    Br Med Bull; 2013; 107():87-100. PubMed ID: 23966422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive imaging of high-risk coronary plaque: the role of computed tomography and positron emission tomography.
    Bing R; Loganath K; Adamson P; Newby D; Moss A
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 93(1113):20190740. PubMed ID: 31821027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radiodiagnostic studies in atherosclerosis].
    Sergienko VB
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2007; (1):11-8. PubMed ID: 18274137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease detection, prognosis, and clinical decision making.
    Dowsley T; Al-Mallah M; Ananthasubramaniam K; Dwivedi G; McArdle B; Chow BJ
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 29(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 23357601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When should myocardial perfusion imaging be a first-test choice?
    Al Rifai M; Winchester D
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 33():101824. PubMed ID: 38360263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group.
    Gershlick AH; de Belder M; Chambers J; Hackett D; Keal R; Kelion A; Neubauer S; Pennell DJ; Rothman M; Signy M; Wilde P
    Heart; 2007 Apr; 93(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17401065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MSCT is better than stress perfusion imaging for detecting CAD--For.
    Cademartiri F; Bax JJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):353-5. PubMed ID: 16435114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MDCT is better than stress perfusion imaging for detecting CAD--Against.
    Di Carli MF; Hachamovitch R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 16435113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.