These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842255)

  • 1. [The profile and tegmental growth].
    Nanda RS
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():829-62. PubMed ID: 1842255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Esthetic impact of the Le Fort I type osteotomy].
    Boulenguiez M; Garcia R; Hadjean E; Négrier B
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():899-919. PubMed ID: 1842257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients.
    Božič M; Kau CH; Richmond S; Ovsenik M; Hren NI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):758-69. PubMed ID: 21130335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective classification of nose-lip-chin profiles and their relation to dentoskeletal traits.
    Tanikawa C; Takada K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):226-38. PubMed ID: 24889019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part III. Postoperative changes after isolated superior repositioning.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 9456605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile.
    Genecov JS; Sinclair PM; Dechow PC
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2389851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The use of regression functions for reconstruction of the cutaneous profile, from facial bone elements].
    Deloison Y; Fenart R
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 9471707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part II. Patients with vertical maxillary excess.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 9456623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 18298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
    De Coster T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Labial retrusion].
    Négrier B; Bourriau G
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9432631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [From the architecture of the nose to nose-chin relations: morphology and esthetics--the finality of corrective surgery].
    Levignac J
    Orthod Fr; 1987; 58 Pt 2():759-69. PubMed ID: 3509628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.
    Türkkahraman H; Gökalp H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):640-7. PubMed ID: 15529499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.