430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18422578)
1. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution.
Knudsen BE; Cook AJ; Watterson JD; Beiko DT; Nott L; Razvi H; Denstedt JD
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 14972459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Varkarakis IM; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Inagaki T; Ong AM; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 15201766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous endopyelotomy for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: prognostic factors affecting late recurrence.
El-Nahas AR; Shoma AM; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17060085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Schenkman EM; Tarry WF
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repair of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the solitary kidney: effect on renal function.
Albani JM; Desai MM; Gill IS; Streem SB
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 17070340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience.
Kim EH; Tanagho YS; Traxel EJ; Austin PF; Figenshau RS; Coplen DE
J Urol; 2012 Oct; 188(4 Suppl):1628-33. PubMed ID: 22906656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrograde treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the ureteral cutting balloon catheter.
Faerber GJ; Richardson TD; Farah N; Ohl DA
J Urol; 1997 Feb; 157(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 8996330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of stent size on the success of antegrade endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: results of 2 consecutive series.
Danuser H; Hochreiter WW; Ackermann DK; Studer UE
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 11490243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty.
Faerber GJ; Ritchey ML; Bloom DA
J Urol; 1995 Oct; 154(4):1495-7. PubMed ID: 7658575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.
Iwamura M; Soh S; Irie A; Kadowaki K; Matsusita Y; Fujioka T; Baba S
Int J Urol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 15242351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Anterograde endopyelotomy].
Surur DM; Iglesias Prieto JI; Mancebo Gómez JM; Massarra Halabi J; Pérez-Castro Ellendt E
Arch Esp Urol; 2002 May; 55(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 12094488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy for the treatment of primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Gerber GS; Kim J; Nold S; Cromie WJ
Tech Urol; 2000 Mar; 6(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 10708150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
