These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842269)

  • 1. Acoustic feedback margin improvements in hearing instruments using a prototype DFS (digital feedback suppression) system.
    Dyrlund O; Bisgaard N
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 1842269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument.
    Dyrlund O; Henningsen LB; Bisgaard N; Jensen JH
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8085114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Clinical experiences when fitting a DFS hearing instrument on children.
    Henningsen LB; Dyrlund O; Bisgaard N; Brink B
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 8085111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback reduction system influence on additional gain before feedback and maximum stable gain in open-fitted hearing aids.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Bohr C; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):737-745. PubMed ID: 30394158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated real-ear measurements of benefit from digital feedback suppression.
    Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Feb; 47(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 18236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing instruments for the elderly hearing impaired. A comparison of in-the-canal and behind-the-ear hearing instruments in first-time users.
    Tonning F; Warland A; Tonning K
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 1842272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive feedback stabilization of hearing aids.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M; O'Connell MP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():56-64. PubMed ID: 8153565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-ear measurement verification for open, non-occluding hearing instruments.
    Lantz J; Jensen OD; Haastrup A; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17365050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of wind noise in four hearing instruments.
    Grenner J; Abrahamsson U; Jernberg B; Lindblad S
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 10990015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gain and feedback problems when fitting behind-the-ear hearing aids to profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Dyrlund O; Lundh P
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 2371540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coupler-related real ear gain. Interaction between subject and hearing aid type.
    Berninger E; Ovegård A; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1585125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System identification of feedback in hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3481-96. PubMed ID: 10380671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into sound attenuation by earmould tubing.
    Flack L; White R; Tweed J; Gregory DW; Qureshi MY
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Aug; 29(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 8563655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in the feedback of hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2821-33. PubMed ID: 10573898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reference ear modeling method for internally feedback controlled digital hearing aid chip.
    Kim S; Lee SJ; Cho N; Song SJ; Yoo HJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5799-802. PubMed ID: 18003331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation.
    Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):119-32. PubMed ID: 3410175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reciprocal measurement of acoustic feedback paths in hearing aids.
    Sankowsky-Rothe T; Blau M; Schepker H; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):EL399-404. PubMed ID: 26520351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.