These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842273)

  • 1. The choice of ABR click polarity and amplitude variables in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Sand T
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 1842273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ABR amplitude and dispersion variables. Relation to audiogram shape and click polarity.
    Sand T; Saunte C
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8184286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory brainstem response with click and CE-Chirp® Level Specific stimuli in hearing infants.
    Ormundo DDS; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 147():110819. PubMed ID: 34198155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Click-evoked and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses from individuals with multiple sclerosis.
    Rishiq D; Harkrider A; Springer C; Hedrick M
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Jan; 740():135460. PubMed ID: 33184036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical correlates of brain-stem auditory evoked potential variables in multiple sclerosis. Relation to click polarity.
    Sand T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 1713839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response elicited by 1,000-Hz filtered clicks.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):181-95. PubMed ID: 2222287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3187380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
    Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of click polarity on the auditory brainstem responses of older men.
    Rawool VW
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 9547923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest variability of the auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in newborn infants.
    Yang EY; Stuart A; Stenstrom R; Green WB
    Audiology; 1993; 32(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 8476353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities.
    Kouni SN; Giannopoulos S; Ziavra N; Koutsojannis C
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 23953938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender effects in auditory brainstem responses to air- and bone-conducted clicks in neonates.
    Stuart A; Yang EY
    J Commun Disord; 2001; 34(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 11409605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation of the auditory brainstem response: effects of click intensity, polarity, and position.
    Ballachanda BB; Moushegian G; Stillman RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 1421460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.