These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842275)

  • 1. Correlations between self-assessed hearing handicap and standard audiometric tests in elderly persons.
    Pedersen K; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 1842275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiometric and subjective assessment of hearing handicap.
    Matthews LJ; Lee FS; Mills JH; Schum DJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Nov; 116(11):1325-30. PubMed ID: 2242265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiologic correlates of hearing handicap in the elderly.
    Weinstein BE; Ventry IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 6865371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly.
    Weinstein BE; Ventry IM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Nov; 48(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 6645432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
    Klein AJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic neuroma: deterioration of speech discrimination related to thresholds in pure-tone audiometry.
    Van Dijk JE; Duijndam J; Graamans K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 120(5):627-32. PubMed ID: 11039874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance-perceptual test and its relationship to unaided reported handicap.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 15064656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hearing tests in practice : Audiometric masking in pure-tone and speech audiometry].
    Rader T; Canis M
    HNO; 2022 Oct; 70(10):783-789. PubMed ID: 36083470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the revised Hearing Performance Inventory with audiometric measures.
    Hawes NA; Niswander PS
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3996791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentence identification in noise and hearing-handicap questionnaires.
    Tyler RS; Smith PA
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 6665513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold.
    Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On prediction of hearing disability.
    Parving A; Ostri B; Katholm M; Parbo J
    Audiology; 1986; 25(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 3753301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.