These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842276)

  • 1. High-frequency amplification with ITC-HA and BTE-HA. A comparative investigation.
    von Buchwald C; Pedersen F; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 1842276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation.
    Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 1842284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing aid benefit related to the POGO amplification formula, evaluated from insertion gain measurements of two BTE hearing aids.
    Vesterager V
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 2075418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-the-canal hearing aids. Their use by and benefit for the younger and elderly hearing-impaired.
    Parving A; Boisen G
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 2336536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical trial of a low-cost, solar-powered hearing aid.
    Parving A; Christensen B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 15224866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating performance with high-frequency emphasis amplification.
    Lee LW; Humes LE; Wilde G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8471790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the bystander-effect of 2.5G mobile telephones on the speech perception of digital hearing aid users.
    Vlastarakos PV; Nikolopoulos TP; Manolopoulos L; Stamou A; Halkiotis KK; Ferekidis E; Georgiou E
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22896928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.
    Garcia TM; Jacob RT; Mondelli MF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 27383708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
    Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Split-band amplification: a HI/LO hearing aid fitting.
    Franklin B
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 7297790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Localization and speech-identification ability of hearing-impaired listeners using phase-preserving amplification.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Howell P; Van Tasell D; Lund S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 16230896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.