These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842284)

  • 1. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation.
    Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 1842284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-frequency amplification with ITC-HA and BTE-HA. A comparative investigation.
    von Buchwald C; Pedersen F; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 1842276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Aided Outcome With Aided Word Recognition Scores Measured With Linear Amplification at Above-conversational Levels.
    Fereczkowski M; Neher T
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):155-166. PubMed ID: 36006438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
    Ito A; Fukuda S; Shimozawa M; Abe K; Kumada J; Nakaya M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.
    Dornhoffer JR; Meyer TA; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(4):215-223. PubMed ID: 32241007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1112-32. PubMed ID: 12243159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical trial of a low-cost, solar-powered hearing aid.
    Parving A; Christensen B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 15224866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.