201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18422930)
21. Active formation of mixed-species grouse leks: a role for predation in lek evolution?
Gibson RM; Aspbury AS; McDaniel LL
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Dec; 269(1509):2503-7. PubMed ID: 12573063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Male traits, mating tactics and reproductive success in the buff-breasted sandpiper, Tryngites subruficollis.
Lanctot RB; Weatherhead PJ; Kempenaers B; Scribner KT
Anim Behav; 1998 Aug; 56(2):419-432. PubMed ID: 9787033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Female mate choice across spatial scales: influence of lek and male attributes on mating success of blue-crowned manakins.
Durães R; Loiselle BA; Parker PG; Blake JG
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 May; 276(1663):1875-81. PubMed ID: 19324796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Kin selection in cooperative alliances of carrion crows.
Baglione V; Canestrari D; Marcos J; Ekman J
Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5627):1947-9. PubMed ID: 12817149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Local genetic structure in a white-bearded manakin population.
Höglund J; Shorey L
Mol Ecol; 2003 Sep; 12(9):2457-63. PubMed ID: 12919483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse.
Semple K; Wayne RK; Gibson RM
Mol Ecol; 2001 Aug; 10(8):2043-8. PubMed ID: 11555247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis).
Vos CC; Antonisse-De Jong AG; Goedhart PW; Smulders MJ
Heredity (Edinb); 2001 May; 86(Pt 5):598-608. PubMed ID: 11554976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct and indirect mate choice on leks.
Saether SA; Baglo R; Fiske P; Ekblom R; Höglund J; Kålås JA
Am Nat; 2005 Aug; 166(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 16032570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The chemical interaction of tadpoles of the frog Rana arvalis Nilss. with conspecific and heterospecific anuran tadpoles].
Kiseleva EI
Zh Obshch Biol; 1995; 56(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 7725786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fine-scale genetic structure among greater sage-grouse leks in central Nevada.
Jahner JP; Gibson D; Weitzman CL; Blomberg EJ; Sedinger JS; Parchman TL
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):127. PubMed ID: 27301494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetic structure among closely spaced leks in a peripheral population of lesser prairie-chickens.
Bouzat JL; Johnson K
Mol Ecol; 2004 Feb; 13(2):499-505. PubMed ID: 14717904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Families in space: relatedness in the Barents Sea population of polar bears (Ursus maritimus).
Zeyl E; Aars J; Ehrich D; Wiig O
Mol Ecol; 2009 Feb; 18(4):735-49. PubMed ID: 19175504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated.
Hoffman JI; Forcada J; Trathan PN; Amos W
Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7130):912-4. PubMed ID: 17287726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Insular shifts in body size of rice frogs in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China.
Wu Z; Li Y; Murray BR
J Anim Ecol; 2006 Sep; 75(5):1071-80. PubMed ID: 16922842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Female choice for males with greater fertilization success in the Swedish Moor frog, Rana arvalis.
Sherman CD; Sagvik J; Olsson M
PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13634. PubMed ID: 21049015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Latitudinal divergence in a widespread amphibian: Contrasting patterns of neutral and adaptive genomic variation.
Rödin-Mörch P; Luquet E; Meyer-Lucht Y; Richter-Boix A; Höglund J; Laurila A
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jun; 28(12):2996-3011. PubMed ID: 31134695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Kin-dependent dispersal influences relatedness and genetic structuring in a lek system.
Cayuela H; Boualit L; Laporte M; Prunier JG; Preiss F; Laurent A; Foletti F; Clobert J; Jacob G
Oecologia; 2019 Sep; 191(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 31422471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The quantitative genetic basis of adaptive divergence in the moor frog (Rana arvalis) and its implications for gene flow.
Hangartner S; Laurila A; Räsänen K
J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1587-99. PubMed ID: 22686568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conservation of the introgressed European water frog complex using molecular tools.
Holsbeek G; Maes GE; De Meester L; Volckaert FA
Mol Ecol; 2009 Mar; 18(6):1071-87. PubMed ID: 19222752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Limited indirect fitness benefits of male group membership in a lekking species.
Lebigre C; Alatalo RV; Soulsbury CD; Höglund J; Siitari H
Mol Ecol; 2014 Nov; 23(21):5356-65. PubMed ID: 25263625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
