269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18423278)
21. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation.
Yamashita Y; Mizuashi K; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17150332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: a comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation.
Hu J; Zhao Q; Tang J; Zheng Z; Qi MC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 45(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17027127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Baba N; Sato M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1788-1793. PubMed ID: 28927955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The need for intermaxillary fixation in sagittal split osteotomy setbacks with bicortical screw fixation.
Choi BH; Zhu SJ; Han SG; Huh JY; Kim BY; Jung JH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 16122655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional mandibular change after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a semirigid sliding plate system for fixation of a mandibular setback surgery.
Ghang MH; Kim HM; You JY; Kim BH; Choi JP; Kim SH; Choung PH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Feb; 115(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 22835657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients.
Mobarak KA; Krogstad O; Espeland L; Lyberg T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 11307427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Thüer UW
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of rigid fixation on orthodontic finishing after mandibular bilateral sagittal split setback: the case for miniplate monocortical fixation.
Cho HJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e310-21. PubMed ID: 22197006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy among mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation using absorbable plates and screws.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 28011183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.
Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1219-27; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 11078132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new condyle repositionable plate for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Baek RM; Lee SW
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):489-90. PubMed ID: 20216449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
