181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18423314)
1. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 17019654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy.
Achiam MP; Løgager V; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 19041207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging.
Achiam MP; Løgager VB; Chabanova E; Eegholm B; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2009 Jul; 34(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 18452023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.
Florie J; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; Birnie E; Lavini C; Reitsma JB; Stoker J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):766-74. PubMed ID: 17340636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.
Rodriguez Gomez S; Pagés Llinas M; Castells Garangou A; De Juan Garcia C; Bordas Alsina JM; Rimola Gibert J; Ayuso Colella JR; Ayuso Colella C
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18320195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent.
Maccioni F; Bruni A; Viscido A; Colaiacomo MC; Cocco A; Montesani C; Caprilli R; Marini M
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):517-30. PubMed ID: 16371574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.
Lauenstein T; Holtmann G; Schoenfelder D; Bosk S; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 11566681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional double-contrast MR colonography: a display method simulating double-contrast barium enema.
Luboldt W; Luz O; Vonthein R; Heuschmid M; Seemann M; Schaefer J; Stueker D; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):930-2. PubMed ID: 11264080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality?
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 17457810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Boraschi P; Donati F
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 27209295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxil, a negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agent, in the evaluation of ulcerative colitis.
D'Arienzo A; Scaglione G; Vicinanza G; Manguso F; Bennato R; Belfiore G; Imbriaco M; Mazzacca G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):720-4. PubMed ID: 10710064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
